Read the article at People here. I have had past experience with mental health situations and people and their rights. This is interesting that a constitutional lawyer is coming in to look at it as unconstitutional, liberty. As much as we want her to be ok, and I love(LOVE) her music, our laws and constitutional rights have to be taken into consideration. Upon saying that, I will say that if you are infringing on somebody’s else constitutional rights, it gets stickier. Seeing as we don’t have all the evidence, I don’t think anybody can judge Britney or smear her at this point. We don’t have all the facts. We won’t get them. I am glad to see this go to court to do what is best for everyone. Also, I read an article in In Touch magazine, February 25, 2008 and I am not sure he is an official spokesperson for the family, so I say Jason Alexander might be just an interesting read and smear.
If she is mentally ill, and can’t even make her own decisions, why should what she says not be protected and why is he violating her right to privacy. It is immoral or unethical and exploitive of any mental disease.
Shame on You, Jason Alexander!
